Subscribe!
Irving utilized thousands of pages of primary documents, including unpublished diaries and private correspondence of high-ranking Nazi officials (such as Goebbels and Himmler), to reconstruct a day-by-day account of Hitler's decision-making.
The Spanish edition, La guerra de Hitler , presents a particular challenge for Spanish-speaking readers. Translated and distributed in the late 20th century, it has sometimes been mis-shelved as a conventional military history. However, without critical footnotes or an introduction clarifying its revisionist nature, an unsuspecting reader might mistake Irving’s distortions for factual history. This is especially dangerous given the persistence of Holocaust denial and minimization in parts of Latin America and Spain. Educators and publishers have a responsibility to contextualize such works as examples of historical revisionism, not reliable scholarship.
To review David Irving’s Hitler’s War (or La Guerra de Hitler in the Castellano edition) is to walk a tightrope. One must distinguish between the undeniable craft of the narrative and the deeply controversial, often discredited, ideology that fuels it. It is a book that every serious student of history should read—not to understand Hitler, but to understand the dangers of the "Great Man" theory taken to its absolute extreme. Irving utilized thousands of pages of primary documents,
The resulting trial in London (2000) became a defining moment for modern historiography. Expert witnesses, including renowned historian Richard J. Evans, meticulously examined Irving’s footnotes and source materials used in Hitler’s War and subsequent publications.
(Spanish title: "La Guerra de Hitler" ) remains one of the most controversial works of 20th-century historiography. Originally published in 1977, the book attempted a unique narrative technique: describing World War II strictly through the eyes of Adolf Hitler. While it gained initial praise for its use of primary documents and diaries previously ignored by other historians, it eventually led to the total destruction of Irving’s academic reputation. Overview of "La Guerra de Hitler" To review David Irving’s Hitler’s War (or La
The version you have in Spanish ( Castellano ) is part of this body of work that argues World War II history was written by the victors, obscuring the "truth" of what really happened in the corridors of power in Berlin.
The edition you referred to, published by Planeta in 1988, is a translation of this extensive research. Main Themes and Arguments Irving se propone en este libro
: Most controversially, Irving claimed that Hitler was unaware of the Holocaust or actively tried to stop it, attributing the "Final Solution" to subordinates like Himmler or Heydrich. Controversies and Falsification
A diferencia de las biografías tradicionales de Hitler, que suelen enfocarse en su ideología destructiva, Irving se propone en este libro, según lo describen reseñas de sus seguidores y fuentes en Internet Archive , describir el conflicto exclusivamente desde la perspectiva del dictador alemán.