Bullish Market Structure (5-3 Wave Cycle) (3) / \ (1)/ \(4) / \ \ / \(2) \______ (5) / \ (B) \ /\ \ / \ \/ \(C) (A)
I’ve been looking at $MARAT and I’m struggling to lock in the current wave count. I’d appreciate a fresh set of eyes. Here’s my working hypothesis and where I see potential issues.
Marat’s strict use of parallel channels often leads to "aesthetically perfect" charts that the market ignores. When price breaks a channel that "should" hold according to time symmetry, there is no robust contingency plan.
Marat's analysis adheres to the three fundamental "unbreakable" rules of the Elliott Wave Theory: never retraces more than 100% of Wave 1.
: As of early 2026, subscription plans for his Elliott Wave Count service are listed through platforms like Lemon Squeezy , with tiers including: Quarterly : $500.00 – $550.00. Annual : $950.00 – $1,000.00. User Reviews and Performance Perspectives
: Users on platforms like Trustpilot often praise Elliott Wave services for teaching the "how and why" behind market movements.
Historically, the MRoVas indicators are positioned at a premium price point (around 9,999 MQL5 units, or equivalent), reflecting their complexity.
| Date | Marat’s Label | Actual Price Action | Alternative Orthodox Count | |------|---------------|---------------------|-----------------------------| | Oct 2025 | Wave 3 of (3) up | Sharp rally | Wave C of a flat correction | | Nov 2025 | Wave 4 triangle | Sideways consolidation | Wave X of double-three | | Dec 2025 | Wave 5 up → new high | Shallow new high then reversal | B-wave of larger flat | | Jan 2026 | Top of major degree | 8% decline | Start of corrective Wave 2 | | Mar 2026 | Wave 2 pullback | 12% drop (overlaps Wave 1 start) | Invalid count – must re-label |
It works on any symbol (Forex, Crypto, Stocks) and any time frame (though typically used on higher timeframes for structure and lower for entry).
Before relying on any Elliott Wave analysis, familiarize yourself with the three inviolable rules of impulse waves. If a wave count violates these rules, it is invalid—regardless of who published it.
The service emphasizes high-conviction setups over high-frequency trading.
Bullish Market Structure (5-3 Wave Cycle) (3) / \ (1)/ \(4) / \ \ / \(2) \______ (5) / \ (B) \ /\ \ / \ \/ \(C) (A)
I’ve been looking at $MARAT and I’m struggling to lock in the current wave count. I’d appreciate a fresh set of eyes. Here’s my working hypothesis and where I see potential issues.
Marat’s strict use of parallel channels often leads to "aesthetically perfect" charts that the market ignores. When price breaks a channel that "should" hold according to time symmetry, there is no robust contingency plan. elliott wave count marat review
Marat's analysis adheres to the three fundamental "unbreakable" rules of the Elliott Wave Theory: never retraces more than 100% of Wave 1.
: As of early 2026, subscription plans for his Elliott Wave Count service are listed through platforms like Lemon Squeezy , with tiers including: Quarterly : $500.00 – $550.00. Annual : $950.00 – $1,000.00. User Reviews and Performance Perspectives Bullish Market Structure (5-3 Wave Cycle) (3) /
: Users on platforms like Trustpilot often praise Elliott Wave services for teaching the "how and why" behind market movements.
Historically, the MRoVas indicators are positioned at a premium price point (around 9,999 MQL5 units, or equivalent), reflecting their complexity. Marat’s strict use of parallel channels often leads
| Date | Marat’s Label | Actual Price Action | Alternative Orthodox Count | |------|---------------|---------------------|-----------------------------| | Oct 2025 | Wave 3 of (3) up | Sharp rally | Wave C of a flat correction | | Nov 2025 | Wave 4 triangle | Sideways consolidation | Wave X of double-three | | Dec 2025 | Wave 5 up → new high | Shallow new high then reversal | B-wave of larger flat | | Jan 2026 | Top of major degree | 8% decline | Start of corrective Wave 2 | | Mar 2026 | Wave 2 pullback | 12% drop (overlaps Wave 1 start) | Invalid count – must re-label |
It works on any symbol (Forex, Crypto, Stocks) and any time frame (though typically used on higher timeframes for structure and lower for entry).
Before relying on any Elliott Wave analysis, familiarize yourself with the three inviolable rules of impulse waves. If a wave count violates these rules, it is invalid—regardless of who published it.
The service emphasizes high-conviction setups over high-frequency trading.